Post-Publication Discussions
Post-Publication Discussions
Post-Publication Discussions and Scientific Debate
Jurnal Manageable | PT Kimshafi Alung Cipta (Alungcipta)
Jurnal Manageable recognizes that scholarly communication does not end upon publication. Constructive intellectual debate, replication studies, methodological evaluations, and evidence-based critiques are essential to advancing scientific knowledge in management, business, entrepreneurship, human resource management, and organizational studies. The journal welcomes scholarly feedback, commentaries, and critical discussions concerning published research in accordance with the ethical principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Channels for Post-Publication Discussion
1. Letters to the Editor / Commentaries
Readers, researchers, and academic professionals may submit formal scholarly letters discussing the methodology, research findings, theoretical arguments, managerial implications, or interpretations of articles published in Jurnal Manageable. Commentaries must be substantive, professional, objective, and supported by relevant scholarly evidence.
2. Author Response & Rebuttal
When a scholarly critique or commentary is accepted for publication, the original authors may be invited to provide a formal response or rebuttal. The editorial board will encourage constructive academic dialogue and, whenever feasible, publish both the commentary and the authors' responses in the same or a subsequent journal issue.
3. Author Direct Correspondence
Readers seeking clarification regarding research methods, statistical analyses, measurement instruments, theoretical frameworks, empirical findings, or research data may contact the corresponding author directly using the contact information available in the published article or its metadata. Such correspondence must respect research confidentiality and applicable data protection requirements.
Criteria for Submitting a Scholarly Critique
- Relevance & Timeliness: Commentaries should ordinarily address articles published in Jurnal Manageable within the preceding 24 months. Significant concerns regarding older publications may also be considered by the editorial board.
- Tone & Objectivity: Submissions must maintain a respectful, professional, evidence-based, and constructive academic tone. Personal attacks, defamatory statements, and unsupported allegations are not acceptable.
- Word Count: Scholarly commentaries should normally contain 1,000-1,500 words and no more than 10 references, unless otherwise approved by the editorial board.
- Originality: The critique must present an original, substantive academic argument and appropriately acknowledge previously published literature.
- Peer Review: Commentaries and author responses are subject to editorial evaluation and may undergo independent peer review when considered necessary.
Matters Leading to Corrections or Retractions
If post-publication discussions reveal verifiable analytical errors, methodological limitations, inaccurate research data, unreliable findings, or possible violations of publication ethics that materially affect the integrity of a published article, the editorial board will conduct an appropriate assessment. Where necessary, Jurnal Manageable may issue a formal Correction, Corrigendum, or Erratum, publish an Expression of Concern, or initiate a Retraction when the reliability or integrity of the article is fundamentally compromised. All editorial actions will follow the journal's Correction and Retraction Policy and relevant COPE guidance.
How to Submit a Comment or Inquiry
Scholars, researchers, and readers interested in contributing to post-publication discussions may submit their scholarly letters, commentaries, or inquiries to the editorial office of Jurnal Manageable through the official journal contact channel.
Journal: Jurnal Manageable
Publisher: PT Kimshafi Alung Cipta (Alungcipta)
Contact: Editorial Office of Jurnal Manageable
Subject Line: [Post-Publication Discussion] - Comments on Article [DOI / Article Title]
Journal Website: https://jurnal.alungcipta.com/index.php/jm
Journal Contact Page: Contact the Editorial Office
Editorial Evaluation and Transparency
The editorial board reserves the right to evaluate the academic relevance, scientific validity, ethical compliance, and suitability of submitted commentaries. Publication decisions are made independently and objectively. Accepted discussions will be appropriately identified and linked to the relevant published articles whenever technically feasible. Jurnal Manageable is committed to fostering responsible scholarly debate, scientific transparency, academic accountability, and the continuous improvement of published research.
e-ISSN: 2830-1870
Publisher: PT Kimshafi Alung Cipta
Publication Ethics Reference: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)





